Flight Control Rocket
Flight Control Rocket
Description (IGDB)
Flight Control Rocket is a sequel to the original Flight Control game. The game has a space theme and instead of the original game's planes and helicopters, the player has to land space ships on a mothership.
Description en cours d'enrichissement.
Médias
Avis des critiques et joueurs
Critiques de la Presse (Metacritic)
« Much like Angry Birds Space, Flight Control Rocket is a great new version of the original game that will keep you addicted and eat up a lot of your spare time, and you'll be humming the theme tune throughout (and beyond). »
« A more than justified sequel. The gameplay doesn't change a lot, but the new features bring some freshness and renovation to the formula, and the new visuals are great. It is as addictive as ever, and a sure bet for your iPhone. »
« Flight Control Rocket may not enjoy the same astronomical success as Flight Control, as it is more a natural progression from the original rather than something completely different. What it does offer is some simple, addictive fun. »
« It feels like what Flight Control Rocket adds takes away a lot of its core simplicity, though. Now it feels like I'm playing as much for collecting the game's new currency as I am for the pursuit of high scores. »
« Firemint take their Flight Control series in to a whole new world filled with sci-fi fantasy fun and pack it with fun and over-the-top ships designed with nothing more in mind but to throw you off your multi-tasking; it's just a shame the shadow of IAP looms in the background and mars the lighthearted mood. »
« It's fun, and EA built a great game on a proven formula. The game simply doesn't feel as earnest and honest as the original Flight Control, but hey. That's progress for ya. »
« Flight Control Rocket is a lot of fun and takes the original's simple gameplay in new directions, but EA's almost force-feeding of its store model is both distracting and offensive. »
« Good stuff, but it does leave you pining for the simplicity of the original. [June 2012, p.84] »